Questions and Controversy Mount over ‘Tooth Worms’
Questions and Controversy Rise over ‘Tooth Worms’New, micro images of worm like structures uncovered inside a dissected molar have researchers puzzling over their true nature. Studies by University of Maryland Dental School researchers recently presented at the annual meeting of
Questions and Controversy Mount over ‘Tooth Worms’
New, micro-images of worm-like structures uncovered inside a dissected molar have researchers puzzling over their true nature.
Studies by University of Maryland Dental School researchers recently presented at the annual meeting of the Microscopy Society of America in Richmond, Va, revealed cylindrical objects extending out of the natural pores or tubules of teeth. Inside a human tooth, more than 50,000 such tubules per square millimeter act as channels running from the nerve up through the tooth. They are associated with transporting hot or cold sensitivity to the tooth nerve.
Scientists have long debated the exact nature of the worm-like structures, which were photographed in clear detail by Ru-Ching Hsia, director of the Electron Microscope Core Facility at the school. Dental professionals have not yet arrived at a common explanation regarding the nature and origin of the structures.
“Most say ‘I have no idea.’ Others say they are made of bacteria, or minerals, or hyphal branches of yeast cells (C. albicans) which have infected the tooth structure, or perhaps they are a cellular process of the dentinal tubules,” says co-presenter Gary Hack, DDS, associate professor in the Dental School. To humor his students, Hack says: “I call them tooth worms and I’m sticking to it.”
The aim of the Maryland study was to investigate the structures with scanning electron imagery and different specimen preparation techniques. The researchers’ observations raised new questions in the controversy over nature of the strange structures. For example, they found two of the cylinder structures within a single tubule, a discovery that challenges the hypothesis that the structures are cellular extensions.
The tubules ranged from 2.6 to 3.5 micrometers in diameter and the worm-like structures were smaller in the tubules in which they appeared. The structures were as long as 9 micrometers, extending out of the tubule opening. Whereas the majority of the structures appear to be hollow and devoid of any content, a number of these structures appear to be solid. The majority of the structures have a diameter ranging from 1.5 to 1.9 micrometers. Other pictures revealed a comparatively thin, hollow structure emerging from a single dentinal tubule.
Source: University of Maryland
