Exposé Reveals Unscrupulous Providers Pushing Unnecessary Implant Placement
In a bid for “perfect smiles,” some implant centers may be prioritizing profit over patient care, recommending full-mouth implants where preservation of natural teeth might suffice, according to an investigative report published by KFF Health News and CBS News.
Dental implants have transformed smiles, restoring function and esthetics for countless patients. Once a niche procedure performed by specialists, implant dentistry has become widespread, with general practitioners across the United States now offering services once restricted to a few. The appeal is easy to understand: a permanent solution to damaged or missing teeth with results that can rival natural esthetics. Yet, as the accessibility and profitability of dental implants have risen, so too have concerns about overuse and potential exploitation within the industry.
Experts are increasingly cautioning against the practice of indiscriminately removing salvageable teeth in favor of full-mouth implants. A recent investigative report from KFF Health News and CBS News reveals troubling trends, including cases of unnecessary extractions, misaligned prosthetics, and complications from unqualified practitioners.
The Rise of Dental Implants and the Impact on Patient Care
Implants were initially viewed as a revolutionary solution for patients with teeth that could not be restored. This popularity has also led to a commodification of implant procedures. Private equity investment in large dental chains has accelerated this shift, pushing some practitioners to recommend costly implants where traditional restorative methods might be sufficient.
These business structures can change the incentives in dentistry, and the outcome is evident in the data. For instance, clinics specializing in full-arch implant procedures have been accused of aggressive treatment approaches, sometimes recommending extractions when teeth could be saved with alternative interventions. This model has led to lawsuits from patients who allege they were pressured into procedures that may have been unnecessary or improperly performed.
The Patient Perspective: A Risky Journey
The KFF Health News and CBS report profiled Becky Carroll, who pursued implants after seeing an advertisement from a clinic promising a “new smile in as little as one day.” For $31,000, she believed she’d regain her confidence with a full set of implant-supported prosthetic teeth. However, her experience quickly turned nightmarish: Carroll alleges that her anesthesia wore off during the surgery, leaving her conscious as screws were inserted into her jawbone. The resulting prosthetics were so misaligned that she could not chew properly for 2 years, ultimately requiring corrective surgery at another clinic.
Carroll’s case is far from isolated. Reporters interviewed experts, including William Giannobile, DDS, DMSc, dean of the Harvard School of Dental Medicine, about the disturbing trend of patients receiving overly aggressive implant treatments at the expense of their natural teeth. For some patients, the decision to extract all their teeth was based on misleading perceptions that implants are more durable than natural teeth — a belief that’s increasingly bolstered by advertising.
The Role of Profit-Driven Dental Chains
The explosion in the number of dental clinics offering implants is largely due to the influence of private equity. Private equity firms have purchased major implant chains, with investments running into the billions. Critics argue that this trend has prioritized profitability over patient well-being, with an emphasis on high-cost procedures like implants.
In some private equity-owned dental chains, patients meet with sales consultants before they see a dentist. This setup raises ethical concerns about the motivations behind treatment recommendations. Are dental practitioners at these chains fully independent in their decisions, or are they pressured to prioritize high-revenue procedures? While some dental professionals assert that private equity ownership brings efficiencies, the trend also raises questions about patient autonomy and informed consent.
The allure of a perfect smile can be powerful, but it is essential for both oral health professionals and patients to approach implant procedures with caution. By focusing on the long-term benefits of preserving natural teeth and ensuring patients understand the full scope of their choices, dental professionals can help steer the implant industry toward a model that prioritizes patient welfare over profit. Click here to read more.
What do you think: Is this a real problem? What do you propose as a solution? Email Executive Editor Kristen Pratt Machado, kmachado@belmontbusinessmedia.com, with your thoughts. The best responses will appear with the next edition of Dental Update.
Not to mention that these providers offer no continuing care, no maintenance, no hygiene services. They sell implants strictly as a commodity, a good to be purchased; not anything to do with any type of healthcare.